Keyword coverage scorer
The createKeywordCoverageScorer() function evaluates how well an LLM's output covers the important keywords from the input. It analyzes keyword presence and matches while ignoring common words and stop words.
ParametersParameters的直接链接
The createKeywordCoverageScorer() function doesn't take any options.
This function returns an instance of the MastraScorer class. See the MastraScorer reference for details on the .run() method and its input/output.
.run() returnsrun-returns的直接链接
runId:
preprocessStepResult:
analyzeStepResult:
score:
.run() returns a result in the following shape:
{
runId: string,
preprocessStepResult: {
referenceKeywords: Set<string>,
responseKeywords: Set<string>
},
analyzeStepResult: {
totalKeywordsLength: number,
matchedKeywordsLength: number
},
score: number
}
Scoring detailsScoring details的直接链接
The scorer evaluates keyword coverage by matching keywords with the following features:
- Common word and stop word filtering (e.g., "the", "a", "and")
- Case-insensitive matching
- Word form variation handling
- Special handling of technical terms and compound words
Scoring ProcessScoring Process的直接链接
- Processes keywords from input and output:
- Filters out common words and stop words
- Normalizes case and word forms
- Handles special terms and compounds
- Calculates keyword coverage:
- Matches keywords between texts
- Counts successful matches
- Computes coverage ratio
Final score: (matched_keywords / total_keywords) * scale
Score interpretationScore interpretation的直接链接
A coverage score between 0 and 1:
- 1.0: Complete coverage, all keywords present.
- 0.7 to 0.9: High coverage, most keywords included.
- 0.4 to 0.6: Partial coverage, some keywords present.
- 0.1 to 0.3: Low coverage, few keywords matched.
- 0.0: The response contains none of the keywords.
Special CasesSpecial Cases的直接链接
The scorer handles several special cases:
- Empty input/output: Returns score of 1.0 if both empty, 0.0 if only one is empty
- Single word: Treated as a single keyword
- Technical terms: Preserves compound technical terms (e.g., "React.js", "machine learning")
- Case differences: "JavaScript" matches "javascript"
- Common words: Ignored in scoring to focus on useful keywords
ExampleExample的直接链接
Evaluate keyword coverage between input queries and agent responses:
import { runEvals } from '@mastra/core/evals'
import { createKeywordCoverageScorer } from '@mastra/evals/scorers/prebuilt'
import { myAgent } from './agent'
const scorer = createKeywordCoverageScorer()
const result = await runEvals({
data: [
{
input: 'JavaScript frameworks like React and Vue',
},
{
input: 'TypeScript offers interfaces, generics, and type inference',
},
{
input:
'Machine learning models require data preprocessing, feature engineering, and hyperparameter tuning',
},
],
scorers: [scorer],
target: myAgent,
onItemComplete: ({ scorerResults }) => {
console.log({
score: scorerResults[scorer.id].score,
})
},
})
console.log(result.scores)
For more details on runEvals, see the runEvals reference.
To add this scorer to an agent, see the Scorers overview guide.